Latest topics
» Kriegsspiel: A Bridge Too Far (AAR)by Martin Sat Nov 16, 2024 6:31 pm
» targeting artillery targets
by Saucier Tue Oct 29, 2024 12:15 am
» Grog can't make it
by Grog Fri Sep 13, 2024 5:59 pm
» Toggle vegetation = true not working
by popeadrian Fri Aug 30, 2024 11:43 pm
» 1862 Kriegsspiel manual by Von Tschiscwitz
by modron Thu Aug 29, 2024 8:23 pm
» SOW Scenario Generator
by popeadrian Sun Aug 25, 2024 5:39 pm
» Guide to map making?
by popeadrian Wed Aug 14, 2024 1:44 am
» SOWWL Artillery batteries
by Uncle Billy Thu Jul 11, 2024 3:15 pm
» Set Up for SOWWL NAPOLEON GAMES For Kriegspiel style
by Uncle Billy Tue Jul 09, 2024 10:35 pm
» The New SOWWL Is Now Available On Steam
by Grog Mon Jul 08, 2024 8:14 pm
» Boxed KS set Wallington NT near Morpeth
by Martin Sat Jun 08, 2024 3:50 pm
» Help Request-Artillery Behavior
by Dutch101 Mon May 27, 2024 4:08 pm
Statistics
We have 1600 registered usersThe newest registered user is Moromir
Our users have posted a total of 30539 messages in 2305 subjects
Log in
New proposed map to node assignments and orientation for battles
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
New proposed map to node assignments and orientation for battles
Proposed battle maps, adjusted for geography.
C = Clockwise
A = Anti/Counter Clockwise
Simple meeting engagements where terrain is not a factor (i.e. Sandbox, HTD settings) may not warrant an adjustment - will make that determination ona case-by-case basis; trying to save scenario creation work when possible.
1. Cramp
2. Ant pm C180
3. Gettysburg
4. Ant am A90
5. Ant
6. ECF
7. Elpine1
8. Trevallion
9. PPT
10. ECF
11. Crampton
12. Alpine
13. PC1
14. Fox
15. Devil A90
16. Mac C90
17. Culps A90
18. Cramp
19. PC2
20. Trevallion
21. PC1
22. Elpine1
23. C90
24. Alp
25. MAC A90
26. Fox
27. ECF
28. DevilsDen A90
29. C180
30. PC1
31. Gettysburg
32. ECF
33. PC3
34. Cramp
35. Ant am
36. PC2
37. Ant am A90
38. Culps
39. ECF
40. Elpine2
41. Alpine
42. MAC
43. Fox
44. PC3
45. ECF
Corps Commanders must both agree for these changes to be made.
Neal
C = Clockwise
A = Anti/Counter Clockwise
Simple meeting engagements where terrain is not a factor (i.e. Sandbox, HTD settings) may not warrant an adjustment - will make that determination ona case-by-case basis; trying to save scenario creation work when possible.
1. Cramp
2. Ant pm C180
3. Gettysburg
4. Ant am A90
5. Ant
6. ECF
7. Elpine1
8. Trevallion
9. PPT
10. ECF
11. Crampton
12. Alpine
13. PC1
14. Fox
15. Devil A90
16. Mac C90
17. Culps A90
18. Cramp
19. PC2
20. Trevallion
21. PC1
22. Elpine1
23. C90
24. Alp
25. MAC A90
26. Fox
27. ECF
28. DevilsDen A90
29. C180
30. PC1
31. Gettysburg
32. ECF
33. PC3
34. Cramp
35. Ant am
36. PC2
37. Ant am A90
38. Culps
39. ECF
40. Elpine2
41. Alpine
42. MAC
43. Fox
44. PC3
45. ECF
Corps Commanders must both agree for these changes to be made.
Neal
Father General- Posts : 945
Join date : 2012-03-25
Re: New proposed map to node assignments and orientation for battles
some maps are not defined. Like 23 and 29...
Leffe7- Posts : 468
Join date : 2012-03-01
Similar topics
» Map Orientation
» Proposed fictional campaign
» ..Battles..
» Where no battles should ever be fought...
» Sunday battles
» Proposed fictional campaign
» ..Battles..
» Where no battles should ever be fought...
» Sunday battles
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum