Latest topics
» Kriegsspiel: A Bridge Too Far (AAR)by Martin Yesterday at 6:31 pm
» targeting artillery targets
by Saucier Tue Oct 29, 2024 12:15 am
» Grog can't make it
by Grog Fri Sep 13, 2024 5:59 pm
» Toggle vegetation = true not working
by popeadrian Fri Aug 30, 2024 11:43 pm
» 1862 Kriegsspiel manual by Von Tschiscwitz
by modron Thu Aug 29, 2024 8:23 pm
» SOW Scenario Generator
by popeadrian Sun Aug 25, 2024 5:39 pm
» Guide to map making?
by popeadrian Wed Aug 14, 2024 1:44 am
» SOWWL Artillery batteries
by Uncle Billy Thu Jul 11, 2024 3:15 pm
» Set Up for SOWWL NAPOLEON GAMES For Kriegspiel style
by Uncle Billy Tue Jul 09, 2024 10:35 pm
» The New SOWWL Is Now Available On Steam
by Grog Mon Jul 08, 2024 8:14 pm
» Boxed KS set Wallington NT near Morpeth
by Martin Sat Jun 08, 2024 3:50 pm
» Help Request-Artillery Behavior
by Dutch101 Mon May 27, 2024 4:08 pm
Statistics
We have 1600 registered usersThe newest registered user is Moromir
Our users have posted a total of 30539 messages in 2305 subjects
Log in
Tactics & technology circa 1830
Page 1 of 1
Tactics & technology circa 1830
Discussion copied from Yahoo group
========================================================================
I'm thinking of putting together a PBEM kriegsspiel, and was looking at
doing something in central europe in the 1830's. Mostly because it is
not a well known period, so any historical flaws will be less obvious
to players better versed in this period than I.
However, I'd like to do a little bit to make it realistic. This time
is equidistant (timewise) between the Napoleonic wars and the ACW, both
of which are obviously very well documented. I don't think there were
any serious conflicts between european or european-style armies in this
period (were there?) but does anyone have any information or sources on
what such a conflict would have looked like? I'm especially interested
in how cavalry and artillery would have been employed (it seems as
though basic infantry tactics had not changed as dramatically between
the napoleonic wars and the start of the ACW)
Anyone have any sources I should look into? Any insights?
thanks,
Jake Battle
========================================================================
There are other options for European "style". For example, Peru
invaded Bolivia in 1841 apparently. There was also an Uruguayan
civil war about that time, which led to Argentinian and then
European interventions.
The great thing about "caudillo" civil wars as campaigns is
that it is much easier to get a well defined result than your
usual wars: the march on the capital either succeeds or fails.
At the moment I am painting 1860 Maximilian War Mexicans, with
the intention of using them for the general run of endemic
Latin American civil wars.
Mark Plant
========================================================================
"I'm especially interested in how cavalry and artillery would have been employed (it seems as
though basic infantry tactics had not changed as dramatically between the napoleonic wars and the start of the ACW)"
Given that rifled weapons were still very uncommon in the 1830s, I think it is reasonable to assume that cavalry and artillery tactics were unlikely to have changed a great deal either.
I would guess that in some of the more esoteric campaigns, shortages of horses for cavalry, or guns for the artillery could be more of a factor. Also a lack of training would probably affect these arms more than the infantry. All that could allow the infantry to sometimes operate more freely than on the Napoleonic battlefield.
Rgds
Martin James
========================================================================
Hi Jake,
You could read up on the Belgian War of Independence in 1830, and the First
Carlist War in Spain 1833-1839. And of course every quarter of a century the
Russians and the Turks had a go at each other: the Russo-Turkish War of
1828-29.
Good luck with your game!
Chris Pringle
========================================================================
Thanks all for the pointers. I think Martin's comments about rifled
weapons is really key - I imagine the introduction of longer ranged
infantry weapons is the key element in relative downgrade of cavalry
strength, and the less aggressive (i.e. right on the battle line) use
of artillery by the ACW. I was surprised to learn how recent an
introduction rifled weapons were before the ACW - makes more sense now
why the generals took so long to adapt to them.
Thanks all
Jake
========================================================================
Hi Jake
The longer ranges certainly made cavalry's life more difficult. It has been argued that the impact in the ACW was less than might have been expected, because the amount of woodland on ACW battlefields meant that the longer ranges didn't always come into play.
I think the process had further to go at that point. The introduction of breechloaders and repeaters really made things tough for cavalry.
Martin James
========================================================================
I found a campaign that is very close to what I am envisioning. In
early 1831 there was an uprisign in Russian Poland that spawned
several major battles between Russian and Polish forces. Judging
from the few maps I saw and some reeanctment picturs, it looks like
the napoleonic wars all over again. In case anyone is interested...
The war...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/November_Uprising
The largest single battle of the war...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Olszynka_Grochowska
Reenactment pictures...
http://www.kepa.waw.pl/olszynka.htm
Jake
========================================================================
Jake
If you're interested in running an email game on this, I'm sure we could raise some players. Can I suggest that you:
(a) wait until after the summer before starting it, and
(b) keep it small for your first game - perhaps 2 players, so you are not overburdened. Somewhere on the website are some more detailed guidelines for running an email game..
Best regards
Martin James
========================================================================
Jake,
I don't think there are any detailed guidelines for running an email game.' on the website, only FAQS for a face to face kriegsspiel.
However there is an article about the Voyage of Capt Catfish, which is effectively a transcript of the umpire - player correspondence for an email game, but this was a one player game. Its at:
http://www.kriegsspiel.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=41&Itemid=76
I certainly agree with Martin, keep it small and simple, if you overstretch yourself the game will fail (been there, seen it done it), better to get the measure of your capabilities and how the players actually respond (rather than what you expect) by running a successful, if limited, game.
Rich Madder
========================================================================
Hello, again.
I posted a while back about Midwest US Kriegspielers.
Sounds like there may be a couple around. I'm out of
the Madison, Wi area. Jake, I might be interested in
trying an email game. I've had Kriegspiel material
(rules, maps, etc) for years that I purchased from
Bill Leeson. Never played, though.
I like the idea of waiting till after the summer.
Difficult time to get commitments. I'm pretty good and
keeping up with email (if there's a reason to). If
you don't mind trying it with a total greenhorn, keep
me in mind. Any campaign is fine with me. By the
way, feel free to send me a direct email if you want
to discuss it. I tend to lag on keeping up with
groups. Need to probably unsubscribe from a few.
Curt Benson
========================================================================
I'm developing/testing a system for a semi-automated PBEM game, I'm
hoping to have it ready to go in late august. I'll definitely post a
note here when I'm ready for players (and I'll try to remember to
send you an email Curt). Here's some early information I have on the
game, and one possible scenario (might do something smaller for the
first go)
http://unfaegne.eorl.googlepages.com/gamerules2
http://unfaegne.eorl.googlepages.com/g1-thegeneralidea
Jake Battle
========================================================================
========================================================================
========================================================================
========================================================================
========================================================================
I'm thinking of putting together a PBEM kriegsspiel, and was looking at
doing something in central europe in the 1830's. Mostly because it is
not a well known period, so any historical flaws will be less obvious
to players better versed in this period than I.
However, I'd like to do a little bit to make it realistic. This time
is equidistant (timewise) between the Napoleonic wars and the ACW, both
of which are obviously very well documented. I don't think there were
any serious conflicts between european or european-style armies in this
period (were there?) but does anyone have any information or sources on
what such a conflict would have looked like? I'm especially interested
in how cavalry and artillery would have been employed (it seems as
though basic infantry tactics had not changed as dramatically between
the napoleonic wars and the start of the ACW)
Anyone have any sources I should look into? Any insights?
thanks,
Jake Battle
========================================================================
There are other options for European "style". For example, Peru
invaded Bolivia in 1841 apparently. There was also an Uruguayan
civil war about that time, which led to Argentinian and then
European interventions.
The great thing about "caudillo" civil wars as campaigns is
that it is much easier to get a well defined result than your
usual wars: the march on the capital either succeeds or fails.
At the moment I am painting 1860 Maximilian War Mexicans, with
the intention of using them for the general run of endemic
Latin American civil wars.
Mark Plant
========================================================================
"I'm especially interested in how cavalry and artillery would have been employed (it seems as
though basic infantry tactics had not changed as dramatically between the napoleonic wars and the start of the ACW)"
Given that rifled weapons were still very uncommon in the 1830s, I think it is reasonable to assume that cavalry and artillery tactics were unlikely to have changed a great deal either.
I would guess that in some of the more esoteric campaigns, shortages of horses for cavalry, or guns for the artillery could be more of a factor. Also a lack of training would probably affect these arms more than the infantry. All that could allow the infantry to sometimes operate more freely than on the Napoleonic battlefield.
Rgds
Martin James
========================================================================
Hi Jake,
You could read up on the Belgian War of Independence in 1830, and the First
Carlist War in Spain 1833-1839. And of course every quarter of a century the
Russians and the Turks had a go at each other: the Russo-Turkish War of
1828-29.
Good luck with your game!
Chris Pringle
========================================================================
Thanks all for the pointers. I think Martin's comments about rifled
weapons is really key - I imagine the introduction of longer ranged
infantry weapons is the key element in relative downgrade of cavalry
strength, and the less aggressive (i.e. right on the battle line) use
of artillery by the ACW. I was surprised to learn how recent an
introduction rifled weapons were before the ACW - makes more sense now
why the generals took so long to adapt to them.
Thanks all
Jake
========================================================================
Hi Jake
The longer ranges certainly made cavalry's life more difficult. It has been argued that the impact in the ACW was less than might have been expected, because the amount of woodland on ACW battlefields meant that the longer ranges didn't always come into play.
I think the process had further to go at that point. The introduction of breechloaders and repeaters really made things tough for cavalry.
Martin James
========================================================================
I found a campaign that is very close to what I am envisioning. In
early 1831 there was an uprisign in Russian Poland that spawned
several major battles between Russian and Polish forces. Judging
from the few maps I saw and some reeanctment picturs, it looks like
the napoleonic wars all over again. In case anyone is interested...
The war...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/November_Uprising
The largest single battle of the war...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Olszynka_Grochowska
Reenactment pictures...
http://www.kepa.waw.pl/olszynka.htm
Jake
========================================================================
Jake
If you're interested in running an email game on this, I'm sure we could raise some players. Can I suggest that you:
(a) wait until after the summer before starting it, and
(b) keep it small for your first game - perhaps 2 players, so you are not overburdened. Somewhere on the website are some more detailed guidelines for running an email game..
Best regards
Martin James
========================================================================
Jake,
I don't think there are any detailed guidelines for running an email game.' on the website, only FAQS for a face to face kriegsspiel.
However there is an article about the Voyage of Capt Catfish, which is effectively a transcript of the umpire - player correspondence for an email game, but this was a one player game. Its at:
http://www.kriegsspiel.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=41&Itemid=76
I certainly agree with Martin, keep it small and simple, if you overstretch yourself the game will fail (been there, seen it done it), better to get the measure of your capabilities and how the players actually respond (rather than what you expect) by running a successful, if limited, game.
Rich Madder
========================================================================
Hello, again.
I posted a while back about Midwest US Kriegspielers.
Sounds like there may be a couple around. I'm out of
the Madison, Wi area. Jake, I might be interested in
trying an email game. I've had Kriegspiel material
(rules, maps, etc) for years that I purchased from
Bill Leeson. Never played, though.
I like the idea of waiting till after the summer.
Difficult time to get commitments. I'm pretty good and
keeping up with email (if there's a reason to). If
you don't mind trying it with a total greenhorn, keep
me in mind. Any campaign is fine with me. By the
way, feel free to send me a direct email if you want
to discuss it. I tend to lag on keeping up with
groups. Need to probably unsubscribe from a few.
Curt Benson
========================================================================
I'm developing/testing a system for a semi-automated PBEM game, I'm
hoping to have it ready to go in late august. I'll definitely post a
note here when I'm ready for players (and I'll try to remember to
send you an email Curt). Here's some early information I have on the
game, and one possible scenario (might do something smaller for the
first go)
http://unfaegne.eorl.googlepages.com/gamerules2
http://unfaegne.eorl.googlepages.com/g1-thegeneralidea
Jake Battle
========================================================================
========================================================================
========================================================================
========================================================================
henridecat- Posts : 146
Join date : 2008-12-10
Similar topics
» Napoleonics in the age of technology and streaming
» Nieman River Battle of 1812 Sunday 21st Feb at 130 EST/1830 GMT
» Tactics,Tactics,Tactics
» Great Reference Material
» Topographische Karte 1:25,000 (German General Staff Maps circa. 1937)
» Nieman River Battle of 1812 Sunday 21st Feb at 130 EST/1830 GMT
» Tactics,Tactics,Tactics
» Great Reference Material
» Topographische Karte 1:25,000 (German General Staff Maps circa. 1937)
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum