Latest topics
» Grog can't make it by Grog Fri Sep 13, 2024 5:59 pm
» Toggle vegetation = true not working
by popeadrian Fri Aug 30, 2024 11:43 pm
» 1862 Kriegsspiel manual by Von Tschiscwitz
by modron Thu Aug 29, 2024 8:23 pm
» SOW Scenario Generator
by popeadrian Sun Aug 25, 2024 5:39 pm
» Guide to map making?
by popeadrian Wed Aug 14, 2024 1:44 am
» SOWWL Artillery batteries
by Uncle Billy Thu Jul 11, 2024 3:15 pm
» Set Up for SOWWL NAPOLEON GAMES For Kriegspiel style
by Uncle Billy Tue Jul 09, 2024 10:35 pm
» The New SOWWL Is Now Available On Steam
by Grog Mon Jul 08, 2024 8:14 pm
» Boxed KS set Wallington NT near Morpeth
by Martin Sat Jun 08, 2024 3:50 pm
» Help Request-Artillery Behavior
by Dutch101 Mon May 27, 2024 4:08 pm
» Grog a little late
by Grog Fri Apr 19, 2024 6:33 pm
» Impromptu Games
by Uncle Billy Fri Mar 15, 2024 3:35 pm
Statistics
We have 1594 registered usersThe newest registered user is TalonLestrange
Our users have posted a total of 30533 messages in 2303 subjects
Log in
Franco-Prussian War using von Tschischwitz Kriegsspiel 1862
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
Franco-Prussian War using von Tschischwitz Kriegsspiel 1862
I have been reading of some of the opening battles of the Franco-Prussian War and would like to try to replicate some of the small engagements. As Richard Clarke points out in the Foreward the rules address both sides, red and blue, as Prussian forces, what remedies can anyone point out to replicate the French forces? Some items to be addressed:
The French Chassepot was apparently state of the art, while the Dreyse needle gun was a somewhat older design.
The French had the Mitrailleuse "machine gun", but was organized along artillery lines, often not being in position to be effectively employed.
The Prussian artillery was breech loading and had a greater rate of fire versus the mussle loading french guns.
Opposite the Saar, the French downright neglect of using cavalry to screen and/or gain/maintain contact with enemy forces arriving to their front.
Any thoughts on how to apply to K/S?
Thanks,
Pete
The French Chassepot was apparently state of the art, while the Dreyse needle gun was a somewhat older design.
The French had the Mitrailleuse "machine gun", but was organized along artillery lines, often not being in position to be effectively employed.
The Prussian artillery was breech loading and had a greater rate of fire versus the mussle loading french guns.
Opposite the Saar, the French downright neglect of using cavalry to screen and/or gain/maintain contact with enemy forces arriving to their front.
Any thoughts on how to apply to K/S?
Thanks,
Pete
Pete Maidhof- Posts : 23
Join date : 2008-12-21
Re: Franco-Prussian War using von Tschischwitz Kriegsspiel 1862
One of the difficulties of dealing with the technological upgrading of the C19.
[quote="Pete Maidhof"]The French Chassepot was apparently state of the art, while the Dreyse needle gun was a somewhat older design.[/q]
Assess impact of French fire and implement prior to the Germans.
[quote="Pete Maidhof"]The French had the Mitrailleuse "machine gun", but was organized along artillery lines, often not being in position to be effectively employed.[/q]
Have them deploy in the artillery lines and fire up to 2k with weak effect.
[quote="Pete Maidhof"]The Prussian artillery was breech loading and had a greater rate of fire versus the mussle loading french guns.[/q]
Grade with different result factors. I think the key problem was the two-set range fuses used by the French artillery. Like the Mitrailleuse the effect should be weak while the German artillery should be much more effective and, I think, have a greater range.
[quote="Pete Maidhof"]Opposite the Saar, the French downright neglect of using cavalry to screen and/or gain/maintain contact with enemy forces arriving to their front.[/q]
(1) Cavalry cannot detach troop markers for patrols
(2) Limit how far they can move from infantry
I know these are general guidelines rather than specific instructions but if you want to adapt the originals it depends on how you view these effects rather than having clear changes.
[quote="Pete Maidhof"]The French Chassepot was apparently state of the art, while the Dreyse needle gun was a somewhat older design.[/q]
Assess impact of French fire and implement prior to the Germans.
[quote="Pete Maidhof"]The French had the Mitrailleuse "machine gun", but was organized along artillery lines, often not being in position to be effectively employed.[/q]
Have them deploy in the artillery lines and fire up to 2k with weak effect.
[quote="Pete Maidhof"]The Prussian artillery was breech loading and had a greater rate of fire versus the mussle loading french guns.[/q]
Grade with different result factors. I think the key problem was the two-set range fuses used by the French artillery. Like the Mitrailleuse the effect should be weak while the German artillery should be much more effective and, I think, have a greater range.
[quote="Pete Maidhof"]Opposite the Saar, the French downright neglect of using cavalry to screen and/or gain/maintain contact with enemy forces arriving to their front.[/q]
(1) Cavalry cannot detach troop markers for patrols
(2) Limit how far they can move from infantry
I know these are general guidelines rather than specific instructions but if you want to adapt the originals it depends on how you view these effects rather than having clear changes.
hammurabi70- Posts : 173
Join date : 2008-12-09
Location : London
Similar topics
» 1862 von Tschischwitz square Kriegsspiel pieces
» 1862 Kriegsspiel manual by Von Tschiscwitz
» April 1862 Kriegsspiel in Oakland CA
» Tables for Baring's translation/adaptation of Tschischwitz
» A gift from the Southern California Kriegsspiel Society to the Kriegsspiel community of Little Gaddesden
» 1862 Kriegsspiel manual by Von Tschiscwitz
» April 1862 Kriegsspiel in Oakland CA
» Tables for Baring's translation/adaptation of Tschischwitz
» A gift from the Southern California Kriegsspiel Society to the Kriegsspiel community of Little Gaddesden
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum