Latest topics
» Impromptu Games
by Morsey Sun Jun 17, 2018 4:37 pm

» Austria 1809 OOB with French Guard
by Uncle Billy Sun Jun 17, 2018 3:41 pm

» A gift from the Southern California Kriegsspiel Society to the Kriegsspiel community of Little Gaddesden
by Martin Fri Jun 15, 2018 2:25 pm

» Kriegsspiel at Origins 2018
by Streetgang6 Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:40 am

» Sunday 24 June Napoleonic Kriegsspiel
by Martin Thu May 31, 2018 6:06 pm

» The Groghead Crew just finished a 1 1/2 year of Vol de a'igle III
by Iconoclast Wed May 30, 2018 10:24 pm

» New to SOWWL & KS Nap Mod - Single Player Scenario(s) Help
by GeeDub Mon May 28, 2018 9:15 pm

» Experimenting with the KS Mod sound files
by Didz Mon May 28, 2018 10:17 am

» OOB accuracy of standard scenario's
by Didz Sun May 27, 2018 9:52 am

» SOW Replay Viewer
by Uncle Billy Wed May 23, 2018 12:00 am

» Sunday 20 May 2018 Napoleonic Kriegsspiel
by Martin Tue May 22, 2018 9:25 pm

» Discussion on Formations
by Grog Mon May 21, 2018 8:42 pm

Statistics
We have 1014 registered users
The newest registered user is LordJesse

Our users have posted a total of 24839 messages in 1976 subjects
Log in

I forgot my password


Discussion on Formations

Go down

Discussion on Formations

Post  Grog on Sun May 20, 2018 2:22 pm

Kevin/Guys

Food for thought

Can we have a look at the formations/drills because, it seems that since we included the Column of Regiments formation, some of the other Inf brigade have become incompatible.
Switching to both Double Line or Skirmish formation will cause the battalions to switch over and march diagonally to their new position,presumably because the battalion numbering sequence in the Drills is now different. Could we try to standardise the sequence?

Whilst I like the 3 battalion frontage in the Column of Regiments formation, and am happy for the AI to use this predominantly, it would be good to have some good alternatives fro the Human player.

I also find it hard to position my battalions where I want them due to the Brigadier being way back from the front line. I'm sure this helps him stay safe when attacking but when in defense or if just deploying, it is much easier to have him up front with the line. This is particularly evident when trying to set up a defensive line on a ridge or behind a river, or even the edge of a wood.

There are some other things but I wondered what peoples thoughts and experiences are here?

Mike
avatar
Grog

Posts : 593
Join date : 2012-08-31
Age : 49
Location : Nottingham, England

Back to top Go down

Re: Discussion on Formations

Post  Mr. Digby on Sun May 20, 2018 3:31 pm

I agree that having the brigade commander mark where the centre front of the brigade will be is a useful guide. You only really need this in defence, as Grog says. In attack he can be behind the first or even second line of battalions.

_________________
The other Martin - Charles Reille, le dernier Maréchal de France.

"Any hussar who has not got himself killed by the age of 30 is a jackass." - Antoine Charles Louis Lasalle, commander of Napoleon's light cavalry, killed in battle at Wagram 6 July 1809, aged 34.

"I had forgotten there was an objective." - Generallieutenant Mikhail Borozdin I
avatar
Mr. Digby

Posts : 4955
Join date : 2012-02-14
Age : 58
Location : UK Midlands

Back to top Go down

Re: Discussion on Formations

Post  Uncle Billy on Sun May 20, 2018 4:11 pm

It's probably time to look at how the brigades transition from one formation to another. However, there will be some battalions jostling about whenever skirmishers are deployed as that opens a hole in the formation.

I agree the brigade commander in the middle of the formation is not ideal, but due to the limitations of how formations are constructed via the csv file, he has to be there. The idea is to have the supporting battalions, (2nd line), be well back from the front line. This keeps them from being fired upon by enemy guns and more importantly, it decreases the general chaos of all the battalions trying to move and engage the enemy at once. Even with this in place, the game engine sometimes spoils things by sending all units to the front line, but it has noticeably reduced this problem.

_________________
I can make this march and I will make Georgia howl.
avatar
Uncle Billy

Posts : 3083
Join date : 2012-02-27
Location : western Colorado

Back to top Go down

Re: Discussion on Formations

Post  Grog on Mon May 21, 2018 8:42 pm

Thanks

There is much more than jostling about with the present formation transitions. They cross right over from left to right and vice versa.

Yes I was mainly talking about formations that we could use for defence.

Being able to pick the frontage of your brigade would be the key factor. 1, 2 , 3 or 4 battalions/cavalry regiments.

There are plenty of formations in the stock game or Randy's Mod, where the Brigade commander is close to the front.

Mike
avatar
Grog

Posts : 593
Join date : 2012-08-31
Age : 49
Location : Nottingham, England

Back to top Go down

Re: Discussion on Formations

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum