Latest topics
» Wargaming in the military
by Martin Yesterday at 10:41 pm

» Impromptu Games
by Uncle Billy Wed Oct 17, 2018 3:57 pm

» Presentation
by Uncle Billy Wed Oct 10, 2018 6:54 pm

» DarkRob's Video of the KS Napoleon Mod
by Uncle Billy Mon Oct 08, 2018 4:43 pm

» Set Up for SOW ACW GAMES For Kriegspiel style
by Uncle Billy Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:55 pm

» September 23rd 2018 face to face game at Little Gaddesdon
by henridecat Wed Sep 26, 2018 8:21 pm

» November 25th 2018 face to face game at Little Gaddesdon
by Mr. Digby Wed Sep 26, 2018 5:55 pm

» October 21st face to face game at Little Gaddesdon
by gunboat diplomat Wed Sep 26, 2018 4:49 pm

» Autumn schedule of face to face games at Little Gaddesdon
by gunboat diplomat Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:49 pm

» 1828 dice tables
by Tim Carne Sat Aug 25, 2018 2:42 pm

» Kriegsspiel revised rules 1828
by Tim Carne Thu Aug 23, 2018 3:32 pm

» Other PC games - Command Ops 2
by Martin Thu Aug 16, 2018 5:58 pm

Statistics
We have 1030 registered users
The newest registered user is afcwfan

Our users have posted a total of 25148 messages in 1991 subjects
Log in

I forgot my password


Discussion on Formations

Go down

Discussion on Formations

Post  Grog on Sun May 20, 2018 2:22 pm

Kevin/Guys

Food for thought

Can we have a look at the formations/drills because, it seems that since we included the Column of Regiments formation, some of the other Inf brigade have become incompatible.
Switching to both Double Line or Skirmish formation will cause the battalions to switch over and march diagonally to their new position,presumably because the battalion numbering sequence in the Drills is now different. Could we try to standardise the sequence?

Whilst I like the 3 battalion frontage in the Column of Regiments formation, and am happy for the AI to use this predominantly, it would be good to have some good alternatives fro the Human player.

I also find it hard to position my battalions where I want them due to the Brigadier being way back from the front line. I'm sure this helps him stay safe when attacking but when in defense or if just deploying, it is much easier to have him up front with the line. This is particularly evident when trying to set up a defensive line on a ridge or behind a river, or even the edge of a wood.

There are some other things but I wondered what peoples thoughts and experiences are here?

Mike
avatar
Grog

Posts : 622
Join date : 2012-08-31
Age : 49
Location : Nottingham, England

Back to top Go down

Re: Discussion on Formations

Post  Mr. Digby on Sun May 20, 2018 3:31 pm

I agree that having the brigade commander mark where the centre front of the brigade will be is a useful guide. You only really need this in defence, as Grog says. In attack he can be behind the first or even second line of battalions.

_________________
The other Martin - Charles Reille, le dernier Maréchal de France.

"Any hussar who has not got himself killed by the age of 30 is a jackass." - Antoine Charles Louis Lasalle, commander of Napoleon's light cavalry, killed in battle at Wagram 6 July 1809, aged 34.

"I had forgotten there was an objective." - Generallieutenant Mikhail Borozdin I
avatar
Mr. Digby

Posts : 4974
Join date : 2012-02-14
Age : 59
Location : UK Midlands

Back to top Go down

Re: Discussion on Formations

Post  Uncle Billy on Sun May 20, 2018 4:11 pm

It's probably time to look at how the brigades transition from one formation to another. However, there will be some battalions jostling about whenever skirmishers are deployed as that opens a hole in the formation.

I agree the brigade commander in the middle of the formation is not ideal, but due to the limitations of how formations are constructed via the csv file, he has to be there. The idea is to have the supporting battalions, (2nd line), be well back from the front line. This keeps them from being fired upon by enemy guns and more importantly, it decreases the general chaos of all the battalions trying to move and engage the enemy at once. Even with this in place, the game engine sometimes spoils things by sending all units to the front line, but it has noticeably reduced this problem.

_________________
I can make this march and I will make Georgia howl.
avatar
Uncle Billy

Posts : 3182
Join date : 2012-02-27
Location : western Colorado

Back to top Go down

Re: Discussion on Formations

Post  Grog on Mon May 21, 2018 8:42 pm

Thanks

There is much more than jostling about with the present formation transitions. They cross right over from left to right and vice versa.

Yes I was mainly talking about formations that we could use for defence.

Being able to pick the frontage of your brigade would be the key factor. 1, 2 , 3 or 4 battalions/cavalry regiments.

There are plenty of formations in the stock game or Randy's Mod, where the Brigade commander is close to the front.

Mike
avatar
Grog

Posts : 622
Join date : 2012-08-31
Age : 49
Location : Nottingham, England

Back to top Go down

Re: Discussion on Formations

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum